According to a specialist, the cost of liquid hydrogen will be five times that of liquefied natural gas, and it has yet to be demonstrated that it is emission-free.
Michael Barnard, the principal strategist of TV Strategy, noted this. He explained his point of view with arguments and proofs.
Barnard attacked everyone who advocated manufacturing liquid hydrogen where there is inexpensive and steady sunshine and wind, and transporting it as a source of energy of being ignorant at the start of the essay.
TV Strategy’s chief strategist said he recently received a call from his former boss, who worked with him in Energy – Green Hydrogen – Namibia – OAPEC – COP26 Climate Summit – Sultanate of OmanCanada and Brazil, inquiring about a green hydrogen project in Namibia that he read about in the Financial Times.
Despite the fact that the calling manager recognizes that the proposal is not financially viable, he encourages the writer to undertake some calculations together to verify their notion.
Barnard added that he couldn’t think of a better comparison than LNG because both hydrogen and LNG are liquefied gases in the first place.
He went on to say that he compared costs on various levels, including transportation costs and the energy needed to liquefy hydrogen and gas, and discovered that the first is 5 times more expensive than the second.
Barnard pointed out that because hydrogen is more expensive to move than LNG, 85 percent of hydrogen producers now use it locally or near their plants.
Many scientific calculations show the greater cost of hydrogen compared to liquefied gas, but the head strategist of TV Strategy believes it might be helpful in the African country.
Namibia, whose economy is 9 percent based on agriculture, relies on South Africa for fertilizer supplies, according to Barnard.
It can, however, provide its own fertilizer needs because it relies on massive amounts of hydrogen.
Fertilizers, unlike hydrogen, are easy to transfer once created, according to the author, who predicts a reduction in demand for it in the future decades.
In his final paragraph, the strategist accuses people who advocate hydrogen as a clean energy source of being “ignorant.”
According to TV Strategy’s chief strategist, not enough research has been done on hydrogen as a future carbon-free energy source, and all present efforts are confined to creating it using inexpensive and reliable sunlight and winds.
It’s worth noting that Europe, which has set a target of being carbon-neutral by 2050, is relying on green hydrogen as one of the key renewable energy sources to help them accomplish this objective.
The implementation of a research in the Queensland province of Australia, which will explore the feasibility of utilizing hydrogen fuel in heavy freight rail locomotives in the province, will begin in January.
And, most recently, a business in the United Kingdom said that it is experimenting with the use of liquid hydrogen fuel in airplanes with government assistance.
