Natural hydrogen exploration has, until recently, been the domain of a handful of junior companies operating with limited resources.
WATCH WEBINAR RECORDING
Natural hydrogen lacks a robust exploration playbook, unlike the established frameworks governing oil and gas or geothermal energy. This absence of standardized methodologies leads to inefficiencies, as many operators replicate mistakes or rely on assumptions not backed by empirical data.
A glaring issue is the reliance on legacy approaches from hydrocarbon exploration, which fail to account for hydrogen’s unique properties. Hydrogen’s molecular size, reactivity, and mobility fundamentally differ from methane, challenging the effectiveness of conventional exploration techniques. For instance, the assumption that hydrogen will behave similarly to hydrocarbons regarding reservoir formation and entrapment has repeatedly proven misguided.
Misconceptions in Geochemical Processes
A significant roadblock lies in the scientific understanding of hydrogen generation and migration. Many exploration strategies are based on simplified or erroneous interpretations of geochemical processes. Mechanisms such as serpentinization, radiolysis, and ferrous iron oxidation are often cited as sources of hydrogen, but they are poorly understood in terms of scalability and commercial viability.
Take serpentinization: while laboratory studies demonstrate hydrogen generation under controlled conditions, the natural environments where these reactions occur are far less predictable. Variations in pressure, temperature, and pH can drastically alter reaction outcomes, and no consistent evidence supports the claim that these processes produce commercially viable hydrogen volumes. Similarly, radiolysis—hydrogen generation through nuclear decay—occurs over geological timescales, making it unsuitable as a standalone source for immediate production needs.
The Elusive Reservoir: Trapping and Retention Challenges
Even if hydrogen is generated in meaningful quantities, trapping it poses another critical challenge. Hydrogen is the smallest and one of the most reactive elements, making it notoriously difficult to contain. Natural fractures, micro-cracks, and porosity in subsurface rocks are often cited as potential reservoirs. Still, these structures are unlikely to hold hydrogen for extended periods due to its propensity to escape or react with surrounding materials.
The Mali well—one of the few documented natural hydrogen producers—illustrates this point. While it produced hydrogen for over a decade, the underlying mechanism sustaining this flow remains poorly understood. Most theories suggest continuous replenishment rather than static entrapment, but this dynamic system is difficult to model and predict. Scaling up production remains speculative at best without a clear understanding of these replenishment processes.
Inadequate Data and Research Frameworks
A recurring theme in natural hydrogen exploration is the scarcity of reliable data. Unlike the oil and gas industry, natural hydrogen exploration is still in its infancy, which benefits from decades of systematic data collection and modeling. The lack of high-resolution geophysical surveys tailored to hydrogen’s unique characteristics hampers the ability to identify promising exploration targets.
Moreover, academic research has been slow to adapt. Many mainstream geoscientists dismissed the viability of natural hydrogen for decades, leaving a significant gap in foundational knowledge. Although interest is growing, much of the current research is fragmented, with limited collaboration between academic institutions, industry players, and regulatory bodies.
Regulatory and Financial Hurdles
The regulatory landscape presents another formidable obstacle. In many jurisdictions, natural hydrogen is not yet recognized as a distinct resource, leading to uncertainties in permitting and development timelines. Regulatory frameworks often lump hydrogen exploration with hydrocarbon activities, ignoring the fundamental differences in geology, risk, and extraction methods.
On the financial front, natural hydrogen exploration struggles to attract sustained investment. Venture capitalists and green funds are wary of the high risks and uncertain timelines, while large energy companies remain on the sidelines, hesitant to commit resources without clearer indications of commercial viability. This leaves junior companies bearing the brunt of financial and operational risks, reminiscent of the early days of oil exploration.
A Path Forward
While challenges abound, they are not insurmountable. Adopting a multidisciplinary approach is the first step toward unlocking natural hydrogen’s potential. Geologists, chemists, and engineers must collaborate to refine exploration methodologies, focusing on the unique properties of hydrogen rather than retrofitting existing hydrocarbon frameworks.
Innovative geophysical techniques, such as high-resolution seismic imaging and soil gas surveys, are already showing promise in identifying potential hydrogen anomalies. Additionally, integrating dynamic flow models into exploration strategies could provide more accurate predictions of hydrogen behavior in subsurface environments. Finally, fostering closer ties between academia, industry, and policymakers will be crucial in developing the knowledge base and regulatory structures needed to support this nascent industry.
Natural hydrogen may not yet be ready to revolutionize the energy landscape, but its potential warrants serious attention. Addressing the challenges head-on with rigorous science, strategic investment, and collaborative innovation will determine whether this elusive resource becomes a cornerstone of the low-carbon future.
Stay updated on the latest in energy! Follow us on LinkedIn, Facebook, and X for real-time news and insights. Don’t miss out on exclusive interviews and webinars—subscribe to our YouTube channel today! Join our community and be part of the conversation shaping the future of energy.
