The 2025 edition of BP’s Energy Outlook delivers a sobering assessment of hydrogen’s prospects in the global energy transition. Despite widespread policy enthusiasm, the report underscores that hydrogen will remain marginal until at least 2040—unless a rapid and coordinated acceleration in decarbonization occurs.
Hydrogen’s current footprint is negligible. BP notes that “the role of hydrogen in the global energy system remains very limited,” a statement supported by the data across both modeled scenarios: Current Trajectory and Below 2°C. In the former, where global decarbonization proceeds at today’s pace, hydrogen adoption barely rises above niche applications. Even in the latter, which assumes far stronger climate policies and behavior shifts, hydrogen’s expansion remains mostly confined to hard-to-abate sectors such as heavy industry, long-haul transport, and high-temperature processes.
The economics remain the main constraint. Hydrogen’s “relatively high cost means it only reaches significant scale in deeper decarbonization pathways,” the report finds. Its competitiveness hinges on three policy levers: strong carbon pricing, sustained public subsidies, and integration with carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS). Without these, private capital remains hesitant to invest in large-scale infrastructure.
A pronounced geographic divide compounds the challenge. BP identifies that hydrogen investment is “concentrated in advanced economies and China,” while emerging markets “are constrained by financing challenges.” This disparity mirrors broader clean energy trends: the International Energy Agency estimates that 90% of the $2.2 trillion in annual clean energy investment in 2025 occurs in developed economies and China, leaving the Global South struggling to access affordable capital for early-stage technologies.
Even under BP’s Below 2°C scenario—where emissions fall by 90% from 2023 levels by mid-century—hydrogen only gains scale in the 2040s. The reason is structural: hydrogen’s role grows only once electrification options are exhausted. As BP models indicate, electricity’s share of total final energy consumption rises from just over 20% in 2023 to more than 50% by 2050 in the accelerated transition. Hydrogen, by contrast, emerges later, serving as a complementary decarbonization vector for industrial heat, shipping, and aviation fuels.
Economic and geopolitical uncertainty further clouds the picture. The report warns that “increased geopolitical fragmentation” and “sustained weakness in energy efficiency” could delay progress. As energy security concerns intensify, some countries may prioritize domestic fossil fuel use over reliance on imported low-carbon technologies, limiting hydrogen’s potential role as a global commodity.
BP’s scenarios depict a world in which energy demand growth is still dominated by emerging economies outside China. Yet, in those same economies, policy frameworks and financial instruments to support hydrogen remain underdeveloped. The result is a two-speed transition: regions with strong fiscal capacity can experiment with hydrogen hubs and ammonia corridors, while others remain locked into conventional fuels.
Ultimately, BP’s Energy Outlook positions hydrogen not as a near-term disruptor, but as a deferred solution awaiting the next wave of decarbonization. “If the energy transition remains slow, hydrogen may remain a niche solution,” the report concludes. Only a deep and rapid transformation—driven by policy alignment, capital mobilization, and systemic carbon pricing—would propel hydrogen beyond its marginal status and into the mainstream energy mix post-2040.
Stay updated on the latest in energy! Follow us on LinkedIn, Facebook, and X for real-time news and insights. Don’t miss out on exclusive interviews and webinars—subscribe to our YouTube channel today! Join our community and be part of the conversation shaping the future of energy.
