Close Menu
Energy NewsEnergy News
  • NEWS
    • Breaking News
    • Hydrogen
    • Energy Storage
    • Grid
    • SMR
    • Projects
    • Production
    • Transport
    • Research
  • SPOTLIGHT
    • Interviews
    • Face 2 Face
    • Podcast
    • Webinars
    • Analysis
    • Columnists
    • Reviews
    • Events
  • REGIONAL
    • Africa
    • Americas
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Middle east
    • Pacific
  • COMMUNITY
  • ABOUT
    • Advisory Board
    • Contact us
    • Report Your News
    • Advertize
    • Subscribe
LinkedIn X (Twitter) YouTube Facebook
Trending
  • Why Physics Dooms the “Green Hydrogen” Fuel Dream
  • NEOM Green Hydrogen Project 80% Completed
  • Green Hydrogen – Pillar of European Industrial Policy but Not Without Challenges
  • Rolls-Royce’s Advanced Battery Storage System Fuels The Netherlands’ Grid Stability
  • Plug Power’s Georgia Plant Sets Record in U.S. Hydrogen Production Milestone
  • What Elon Musk Really Thinks About Hydrogen
  • HyTANKa Brings Mobile Hydrogen Refueling to Construction Sites
  • DOE Terminates $3.7B in Clean Energy Awards, Citing Economic Viability and Security Concerns
LinkedIn X (Twitter) YouTube Facebook
Energy NewsEnergy News
  • NEWS
    • Breaking News
    • Hydrogen
    • Energy Storage
    • Grid
    • SMR
    • Projects
    • Production
    • Transport
    • Research
  • SPOTLIGHT
    • Interviews
    • Face 2 Face
    • Podcast
    • Webinars
    • Analysis
    • Columnists
    • Reviews
    • Events
  • REGIONAL
    • Africa
    • Americas
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Middle east
    • Pacific
  • COMMUNITY
  • ABOUT
    • Advisory Board
    • Contact us
    • Report Your News
    • Advertize
    • Subscribe
Energy NewsEnergy News
Home Home - Projects
Nickel

DOE Terminates $3.7B in Clean Energy Awards, Citing Economic Viability and Security Concerns

Anela DoksoBy Anela Dokso02/06/20254 Mins Read
Share
LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Email WhatsApp Telegram

The Department of Energy (DOE) has rescinded 24 previously awarded clean energy demonstration projects totaling more than $3.7 billion in federal funding.

The decision, announced by Energy Secretary Chris Wright, follows a newly implemented review process that scrutinizes financial assistance through the lens of economic viability, national security, and return on taxpayer investment.

The terminated awards were issued under the Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations (OCED) and included significant funding for projects in carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) and broader decarbonization technologies. According to DOE, the review found that these projects “failed to advance the energy needs of the American people, were not economically viable, and would not generate a positive return on investment.”

A notable detail in the DOE’s announcement is the timing of the original approvals: 16 of the 24 awards—roughly 70%—were signed between Election Day and January 20th, suggesting a late-stage administrative push under the previous administration. This batch of last-minute allocations has drawn criticism from the current DOE leadership, who argue that financial diligence was lacking at the time of issuance.

Secretary Wright framed the cancellations as a corrective measure: “While the previous administration failed to conduct a thorough financial review before signing away billions of taxpayer dollars, the Trump administration is doing our due diligence to ensure we are utilizing taxpayer dollars to strengthen our national security, bolster affordable, reliable energy sources and advance projects that generate the highest possible return on investment.”

Policy Reset: New Framework for Federal Energy Support

This reversal comes shortly after the release of a DOE Secretarial Memorandum titled “Ensuring Responsibility for Financial Assistance.” The document outlines a revamped evaluation protocol for federal energy grants, designed to identify inefficient spending and align funding with core energy priorities. The terminated projects were the first to be assessed under this stricter framework.

DOE officials stated that the evaluation involved a “case-by-case analysis” of financial risk, technology maturity, expected emissions reductions, and strategic relevance. While the memo doesn’t specify exact performance metrics, it emphasizes safeguarding taxpayer dollars from waste and reinforcing American energy independence.

Although the DOE did not release a full list of the cancelled projects, the emphasis on carbon capture and decarbonization raises concerns among industry stakeholders. CCS, in particular, has seen a surge in attention as a potential pillar of industrial decarbonization—especially in hard-to-abate sectors like cement, steel, and fossil-fuel power generation.

With many CCS projects still in early demonstration phases, critics warn that cutting funding could stall progress and erode investor confidence. However, DOE officials counter that the terminated projects lacked the financial foundation or technical viability to reach successful deployment, and that limited public funds should be concentrated on “projects that generate the highest possible return on investment.”

Strategic Reallocation or Retreat from Clean Tech?

The decision raises broader questions about the direction of U.S. federal clean energy support. DOE’s new policy stance suggests a sharper focus on cost-benefit discipline, possibly favoring conventional or near-commercial technologies over high-risk R&D efforts. Whether this amounts to a strategic reallocation of federal energy dollars or a retreat from emerging climate technologies will depend on how future awards are structured and to what extent DOE supports innovation under higher uncertainty.

What is clear is that this move has immediate fiscal implications—DOE claims the cancellations will yield $3.6 billion in immediate savings—but longer-term consequences for U.S. climate competitiveness and industrial transition remain to be seen.


Stay updated on the latest in energy! Follow us on LinkedIn, Facebook, and X for real-time news and insights. Don’t miss out on exclusive interviews and webinars—subscribe to our YouTube channel today! Join our community and be part of the conversation shaping the future of energy.

battery energy storage hydrogen smart grid
Share. LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Email

Related Posts

Hydrogen

Why Physics Dooms the “Green Hydrogen” Fuel Dream

03/06/2025
Green Hydrogen

NEOM Green Hydrogen Project 80% Completed

03/06/2025
Green Hydrogen - Pillar of European Industrial Policy but Not Without Challenges

Green Hydrogen – Pillar of European Industrial Policy but Not Without Challenges

03/06/2025
Rolls-Royce's Advanced Battery Storage System Fuels The Netherlands' Grid Stability

Rolls-Royce’s Advanced Battery Storage System Fuels The Netherlands’ Grid Stability

03/06/2025
Plug Power's Georgia Plant Sets Record in U.S. Hydrogen Production Milestone

Plug Power’s Georgia Plant Sets Record in U.S. Hydrogen Production Milestone

03/06/2025
hydrogen

What Elon Musk Really Thinks About Hydrogen

03/06/2025
Hydrogen

Why Physics Dooms the “Green Hydrogen” Fuel Dream

03/06/2025
Green Hydrogen

NEOM Green Hydrogen Project 80% Completed

03/06/2025
Green Hydrogen - Pillar of European Industrial Policy but Not Without Challenges

Green Hydrogen – Pillar of European Industrial Policy but Not Without Challenges

03/06/2025
Rolls-Royce's Advanced Battery Storage System Fuels The Netherlands' Grid Stability

Rolls-Royce’s Advanced Battery Storage System Fuels The Netherlands’ Grid Stability

03/06/2025

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news from the hydrogen market subscribe to our newsletter.

LinkedIn X (Twitter) Facebook YouTube

News

  • Inteviews
  • Webinars
  • Hydrogen
  • Spotlight
  • Regional

Company

  • Advertising
  • Media Kits
  • Contact Info
  • GDPR Policy

Subscriptions

  • Subscribe
  • Newsletters
  • Sponsored News

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news from EnergyNewsBiz about hydrogen.

© 2025 EnergyNews.biz
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Accessibility

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.