German utility RWE withdrew from Namibia’s $10 billion Hyphen green ammonia project, abandoning a 2022 memorandum of understanding that anticipated 300,000 metric tons of annual ammonia offtake starting in 2027.
The decision reflects deteriorating economics in the hydrogen derivatives market as European demand materializes substantially slower than the forecasts that underpinned investment commitments three years ago, casting doubt on southern Africa’s strategy to position itself as a renewable hydrogen export hub.
The Hyphen project represents the scale of capital required to decarbonize ammonia production—a compound primarily consumed in fertilizer manufacturing that currently relies on natural gas feedstock. Green ammonia substitutes electrolytic hydrogen derived from renewable electricity for conventional steam methane reforming, a process that increases production costs by multiples while requiring extensive wind and solar infrastructure in regions with optimal renewable resources. Namibia’s coastal geography offers high-capacity factors for both technologies, yet the project’s viability depends on sustained European demand willing to absorb premium pricing relative to fossil-derived alternatives.
RWE’s statement attributed the withdrawal to demand development that “develops more slowly than expected in Europe,” a characterization that understates the structural challenges confronting hydrogen derivatives markets. European ammonia consumption reached approximately 18 million metric tons in 2023, dominated by fertilizer producers operating on cost-minimized supply chains. Green ammonia premiums—estimates vary between 2-4x conventional pricing depending on renewable electricity costs and electrolyzer utilization rates—create adoption barriers absent regulatory mandates or carbon pricing mechanisms sufficient to close the cost gap.
The 2022 memorandum of understanding occurred during peak hydrogen market optimism, when European policymakers anticipated rapid industrial decarbonization driven by the EU’s Fit for 55 package and REPowerEU initiatives following Russian gas supply disruptions. These policy frameworks established renewable hydrogen targets of 10 million tons of domestic production and 10 million tons of imports by 2030, creating perceived offtake certainty that justified exploratory agreements with projects in Namibia, Chile, and Australia. Three years later, actual hydrogen demand growth has proven negligible as industrial consumers confront economic realities: retrofitting existing ammonia plants for hydrogen feedstock requires capital expenditures while operating on higher-cost inputs, creating competitive disadvantages against producers maintaining conventional processes.
Hyphen spokesperson Ricardo Goagoseb emphasized that RWE’s commitment remained non-binding, noting the company “had only signed a memorandum of understanding to explore potential off-take, not made any final purchasing agreement.” This distinction matters commercially—Hyphen cannot secure project financing without binding offtake contracts that demonstrate revenue certainty to lenders. RWE’s departure removes a cornerstone customer for the 300,000-ton volume, approximately 1.7% of European ammonia demand, complicating efforts to achieve financial close on the $10 billion investment.
The project faces additional complexity from indigenous land rights disputes. The Nama Traditional Leaders Association and European Centre for Constitutional and Human Rights issued complaints in April 2024, asserting that the concession area encompasses ancestral Nama territory within a national park, violating indigenous consultation protocols under international frameworks. Andrea Pietrafesa, legal advisor at the European Centre for Constitutional and Human Rights, stated the withdrawal prevents RWE from purchasing “goods produced on land where indigenous rights are violated.” RWE explicitly denied any connection between its commercial decision and these objections, maintaining the withdrawal stems solely from market conditions.
This disconnection between stated rationale and parallel developments warrants scrutiny. European due diligence regulations increasingly require companies to assess human rights impacts throughout supply chains, particularly for projects in jurisdictions with contested land tenure. While RWE attributes its decision purely to demand fundamentals, the timing coincides with heightened regulatory exposure to indigenous rights violations, suggesting reputational and compliance risks may factor into investment reconsideration even if not publicly acknowledged.
The broader retreat from green hydrogen projects extends beyond Namibia. Multiple announced projects in Australia, Chile, and the Middle East have encountered delays, cost escalations, or cancellations as developers confront capital intensity that exceeds initial estimates. Electrolyzers—the technology converting water to hydrogen using renewable electricity—have not achieved anticipated cost reductions through manufacturing scale, with system costs remaining near $1,000-1,500 per kilowatt despite projections of sub-$500/kW pricing by 2025. These persistently high capital costs, combined with renewable electricity prices that exceed industrial baseload alternatives in most markets, extend payback periods beyond investor return thresholds.
Namibia’s green hydrogen strategy positioned the nation as a renewable energy exporter, leveraging abundant wind and solar resources along the Atlantic coast, targeting European and Asian markets transitioning away from fossil fuels. The National Green Hydrogen Strategy envisions multiple gigawatt-scale projects generating export revenues while creating domestic employment in equipment manufacturing and operations. RWE’s withdrawal undermines this narrative by demonstrating that resource availability alone cannot overcome demand-side economics when customers face margin compression from higher-cost inputs.
European hydrogen policy has oscillated between ambitious targets and implementation delays that defer actual demand. The EU’s renewable fuels of non-biological origin (RFNBO) framework established certification standards for green hydrogen, yet domestic production capacity remains negligible and import infrastructure undeveloped. Germany’s hydrogen import strategy references Namibian projects as potential suppliers, yet actual procurement mechanisms and price support instruments remain undefined three years after initial policy announcements. This gap between policy ambition and commercial reality creates the demand uncertainty that drove RWE’s reassessment.
The $10 billion Hyphen project scale reveals capital allocation challenges inherent to green hydrogen infrastructure. Comparable investments in renewable electricity generation or battery storage offer more immediate returns serving established power markets, whereas green ammonia projects depend on customer adoption that may not materialize within asset lifetimes. Namibia lacks domestic ammonia consumption sufficient to absorb production, making the project entirely dependent on export markets—a vulnerability RWE’s withdrawal has now exposed.
Project developers globally face similar recalibration as early-stage hydrogen demand fails to justify investment commitments made during the 2021-2022 market enthusiasm. The technology remains viable for specific applications where decarbonization mandates or carbon pricing justify premium costs, yet the mass-market adoption timeline has extended substantially. RWE’s decision signals that European utilities are prioritizing near-term profitable investments in wind, solar, and battery storage over speculative hydrogen derivatives ventures dependent on policy support that has not manifested at scale.
Namibia’s government must now reassess whether the Hyphen project can proceed without RWE’s offtake, potentially requiring additional European or Asian customers willing to commit to long-term purchasing agreements. Alternative project structures involving domestic ammonia consumption or phased development to match actual demand growth may offer paths forward, though these would reduce the project’s scale and economic impact. The indigenous land rights dispute adds complexity requiring resolution before any revised project structure can advance, as international financing institutions increasingly mandate free, prior, and informed consent from affected communities.
Stay updated on the latest in energy! Follow us on LinkedIn, Facebook, and X for real-time news and insights. Don’t miss out on exclusive interviews and webinars—subscribe to our YouTube channel today! Join our community and be part of the conversation shaping the future of energy.
