By 
A yellow-orange sign with thirteen digits on it will indicate drivers how much money they may have saved in the future.
Larger filling stations will be required to provide their customers with an “energy cost comparison” starting in October. Plus, the expenses for 100 kilometers using seven various energy sources ranging from electricity to hydrogen to premium gasoline, as well as two different vehicle sizes.
Due to a lack of data, only a figure for hydrogen in smaller cars is absent. What is the purpose of the poster, and what can it accomplish – and what cannot it do?
What is the purpose of the poster?
It carries out a directive from the European Union. According to the legislative wording, the goal is to “assist future consumer purchase decisions when selecting a passenger car.” The concept is that the user should be able to quickly evaluate how much energy costs for a 100-kilometer journey using various modes of transportation.
In theory, this is also beneficial at the ADAC in order to establish transparency and “to influence the purchasing choice to some extent.” “The comparison makes it obvious that electromobility is not only a climate-friendly, but also a financially appealing choice for many motorists,” says the Federal Association of Energy and Water Management (BDEW).
What is depicted on the poster?
A medium or upper-class automobile with premium gasoline costs 11.42 euros in fuel or energy expenses per 100 kilometers, according to the current poster, which should be updated quarterly and may be obtained from the Ministry of Economic Affairs. It would cost 11.00 euros with Super E10, 7.48 euros with diesel, and 4.84 euros with a Stromer. 6.39 euros for natural gas H, 4.96 euros for LPG, and 7.60 euros for hydrogen.
What causes these values to exist?
The three best-selling cars and their official consumption according to the current WLTP driving cycle are utilized for each type of drive in each of the two vehicle categories. This offers you an average per-100-kilometer usage. This results in expenses per 100 kilometers when combined with the price of the relevant energy source. The ministry uses the second quarter’s average value for the pricing. These figures, however, are not listed on the poster.
Is the information reliable?
Even if the numbers are computed and given to the cent, they can only be used as approximate comparisons for a variety of reasons. For starters, the customer who views the billboard while refueling is likely to drive a different automobile and consume differently. His driving style also makes a significant impact in this situation.
Furthermore, the average prices of the second quarter are presently utilized for the computation, according to data from the Federal Ministry of Economics. According to ADAC data, diesel has increased in price by roughly 9 cents per liter since then.
Finally, as the name implies, it’s just a cost comparison of energy. Other car-related expenditures, such as purchasing, repairs, insurance, and taxes, are automatically excluded, despite the fact that they typically outweigh the energy costs.
Stromer is a unique case.
Electric automobiles, which are the cheapest according to the comparison, are particularly prone to inaccuracies in the computation. The MWV mineral oil business group says, “There is no information that electric automobiles are based on the typical home power price.” “Public and, above important, rapid charging are generally more expensive, which minimizes the price gap between gasoline and electric vehicles.”
A typical residential power price, according to the BDEW energy sector group, is little over 30 cents per kilowatt hour. It costs 39 to 45 cents at public charging stations, and 49 to 79 cents for rapid charging stations. This involves, among other things, infrastructure, operation, maintenance, land usage, and payment processing. The BDEW, however, requests that these costs be taken into consideration so that the information on the billboard “may be harmonized with human experience.”
The usage of the domestic electricity price is justified by the fact that more than 80% of charging occurs at home, according to the Ministry of Economic Affairs. However, in the medium run, the expenses of charging en route should be factored into the equation.
Comments